Stuff that matters:
- For the Linux/X11 platform both GTK+ and Qt are “native”.
- That was all of the arguments I saw against Qt, and neither was convincing.
- Which is fine, that’s his choice
- I just don’t see why he’s having to try to make up excuses after the fact.
- What do you mean “good Qt browser”?
- use Opera. It’s Qt
- but Google Earth still uses Qt in 2009
- I am also disappointed to see that gtk is being used for Chrome
- I also really had high hopes for the firefox qt port
- They use Qt menus and file dialogs
- I have to say that I’m disappointed that they chose GTK too
- I was looking forward to having a great browser that was Qt based.
- well that said i definately wont use chrome.
- I don’t think. I think that we needs a Webkit plugin for Konqueror
- Uuh can’t wait to start using konqueror with QtWebKit 4.5 mmmmmm…..weeebkit…*droooool*
Source
Don’t you nerds have anything better to do? Like taking over the world for example?
Cheers
-Richard
Tags Rant, Geek Documents
Leave a Reply
February 16th, 2009 at 21:29
Nerds?
This coming from the guy who has a preferred Nivea product? (http://propirate.net/oracle/archives/2009/01/23/nivea/)
Thanks for dropping a note though.
Regards,
- Michael Pyne
February 17th, 2009 at 10:56
I am pretty fine with GTK. I guess. The only thing I hate about it are these crappy, mis-designed, annoying file dialogs.
February 18th, 2009 at 10:43
@Michael:
Of course THAT is part of my secret plot to take over the world.
Cheers
-Richard